IBChemistryInternal AssessmentHLSL

Chemistry IA Evaluation and Conclusion Writer

Write a thorough evaluation of your Chemistry IA procedure, analyzing systematic and random errors, and crafting a conclusion aligned to your hypothesis.

Chemistry IAEvaluationError AnalysisConclusionInternal Assessment
Try in Our AI Chatbot

The Prompt

Copy this prompt and paste it into ChatGPT to get started

Act as an IB Chemistry IA examiner. Help me write the evaluation and conclusion of my Chemistry IA: **CONCLUSION:** 1. **Restate Your Research Question and Hypothesis** 2. **Summarize Key Findings**: Present your main result with uncertainty - Example: "The activation energy was determined to be $$E_a = 54.2 \pm 3.1 \text{ kJ mol}^{-1}$$" 3. **Compare to Hypothesis**: Was your prediction supported? To what extent? 4. **Compare to Literature Values**: Calculate percentage error $$\text{\% error} = \frac{|\text{experimental} - \text{literature}|}{\text{literature}} \times 100\%$$ 5. **Explain Any Discrepancy**: Use chemistry to explain WHY results differ from expected **EVALUATION OF PROCEDURE:** 6. **Systematic Errors** (shift results in one direction): - Heat loss to surroundings in calorimetry - Incomplete reactions - Impure reagents - Parallax error in readings - How each affects your results (overestimate or underestimate?) 7. **Random Errors** (cause scatter in data): - Difficulty in judging exact colour change (endpoint) - Temperature fluctuations - Timing reactions by hand - Reading meniscus position 8. **Strengths of Your Method**: What worked well? What gave reliable data? 9. **Weaknesses Linked to Improvements**: | Weakness | Impact | Improvement | |----------|--------|-------------| | Heat loss | Underestimates enthalpy | Use bomb calorimeter / better insulation | | Judging endpoint | Random error in titre | Use pH probe / data logger | 10. **Realistic Extensions**: How could this be investigated further? **Common Mistakes:** - Writing vague improvements: "Use better equipment" (WHAT equipment? WHY?) - Not distinguishing systematic from random errors - Forgetting to link each weakness to its IMPACT on results - Conclusion that doesn't address the research question directly - Not comparing experimental values to literature values **IB Tip:** The evaluation criterion is worth 25%. A strong evaluation acknowledges weaknesses honestly and proposes specific, justified improvements. **My results and procedure:** [PASTE YOUR RESULTS OR DESCRIBE YOUR EXPERIMENT]

How to Use This Prompt

1

Click "Use in ChatGPT"

The prompt will be automatically copied to your clipboard and ChatGPT will open in a new tab

2

Paste the prompt (Ctrl+V)

In ChatGPT, paste the prompt and replace the placeholder with your specific question or problem

3

Get detailed help

ChatGPT will provide step-by-step guidance following the prompt's structure and IB standards

Need More Help?

Try our free AI chatbot for instant IB help across all subjects, or work with an expert human tutor for personalized support.